Monday, September 30, 2013

中國高中生來美留學 7年增365倍

中國高中生來美留學 7年增365倍
by 大陸新聞組/北京30日電
09.30.13 - 06:10 am

中國官方調查研究指出,中國已是留學生的主要來源國之一,連續四年成為美國留學生總數最多的國家。根據調查,中國高中生赴美留學在七年時間內增加365倍。

南方都市報30日報導,中國與全球化研究中心和社會科學文獻出版社日前共同發布「國際人才藍皮書:中國留學生發展報告」指出,中國的留學生正有年紀低齡化,而且加劇的趨勢,同時因為金融危機以及現實因素考慮,中國在未來幾年可能會面對留學人才回流高潮。

報導指出,藍皮書指出,國際留學生主要來自亞洲國家。2011年,52.7%的國際留學生來自亞洲,23.1%的國際留學生來自歐洲,11.6%的國際留學生來自非洲,拉丁美洲和加勒比海地區占6.1%,北美洲占2.7%,大洋洲占0.9%。

從國別來看,中國、印度和韓國這三個國家則是國際留學生的主要來源國。其中,中國以20%以上的年增長率,已經連續四年成為美國留學生總數最多的國家。藍皮書以2010年為例,當年中國留學生的數量占到國際留學生總量的17%,是美國、英國、法國、澳洲、加拿大、日本等主要留學生接收國的第一大留學生來源國。

藍皮書指出,2011年到2012學年,中國留學美國的本科生增長率為31%,占中國留美學生的38.4%,留美本科生已經接近赴美讀研究生人數,即45.6%。 

根據中國與全球化研究中心對北京市五所中學出國留學情況的抽樣調查,近三年,高中生出國留學的人數和留學人數占畢業生總數的比率都有所上升,出國留學人數從2010年的215人,上升到2012年385人,占當年畢業生總數的比例從2010年的9.28%提高到2012年的15.74%。在高中生赴美人數上,從2005年到2006年的65人,到2012年到2013年的2萬3795人,七年內爆增365倍,極為驚人。

在此同時,留學生年齡明顯出現偏低趨勢,出國留學的學生中三分之二以上成績優秀,是班上的尖子生。有68.25%的學生出國前成績在班中排名為前25%,排名前50%的占89.8%。只有10.2%的學生學習成績在班級排名為50%以後。低齡留學生優質化,反映出中國國青少年人才流失的嚴峻趨勢。

藍皮書並指,近年來,中國留學人員呈現加速回中國的態勢。1978年到2012年,中國留學回國人數累計為109萬1300人。近五年回中國的留學人員達到近80萬人,接近前30年的3倍。特別是2012年,留學人員返回中國數量達到27萬2900人,同比增長46.56%。對此現象,人力資源和社會保障部部長尹蔚民形象地稱為「有史以來最大的回國潮」。
© worldjournal.com 2013

Saturday, September 21, 2013

海外购房潮掏空中国? 加国华人新移民买房价远超平均水平

海外购房潮掏空中国? 加国华人新移民买房价远超平均水平

2013-09-20 时事述评  加拿大家园


在刚刚过去的两周,笔者驾车环游了加拿大多伦多,美国纽约州的布法罗、纽约、费城,新泽西州的爱迪生,康乃狄格州的纽黑文等地,又一次实地考察了北美房地产市场的最新状况以及华人群体的购房新情况。


华人已是美加房地产市场上一支重要的生力军。中国因素是美国房地产市场火爆的重要推动因素之一,也造成了中国国内房地产市场需求及资金的流失。这是一个不断"釜底抽薪"的过程,长期定会对中国国内市场产生质的影响。


第一站,加拿大的多伦多。近两年来,多伦多的房地产市场持续火爆,即使在金融危机风暴中,多伦多房价整体上也没有发生大的下跌。最近半年来多伦多房地产市场非常火爆,尤其是华人聚集的Markham市和Richmond Hill市。这两个城市华人人口占到30%以上。


由于加拿大银行对新移民置业提供一些优惠措施,笔者认识的几个新移民朋友都在最近一年内购买了住房,而且基本上是价值100万加元(约合72.66万欧元)以上独立的HOUSE(独立屋,即中国国内所说的"独栋别墅",区别于"公寓",即中国国内的楼房。独立屋是北美主要的房屋形态),普遍首付三成左右,30年左右按揭,5年锁定利率3.15%左右,最近一个月左右加拿大刚刚上浮了利率,大概会在3.3%左右。


华人这个购房数据大大超过了多伦多市政府统计的居民房屋价格40万加元(约合29.06万欧元)的统计中值,而且也普遍超过来加拿大5年以上的老华人移民购买房屋的价格。


美国纽约州布法罗的朋友今年也感觉到房价明显上升了8%左右,市场交投十分活跃。笔者在当地一位华人中介的带领下参观了一座在建的新房项目。面积3000平方英尺(约合279平方米)左右,全实木地板,精装修,50万美元的样子。而且我们看的是正在布置的第二套样板房,中介说第一套样板房已经被华人购买。


另外,我们还看了一套可以说"金碧辉煌"的5000平方英尺(约合465平方米)的二手房豪宅,要价80万美元左右。当地最知名的大学是纽约州立大学,当地一位老华人移民朋友围绕着学校大大小小购买了二十几套房子用于出租,租金回报率非常可观。而另外一位正在办理移民的朋友已在近期购买了当地一套独立HOUSE和一套公寓。


新泽西州是美国的花园之州,其中的爱迪生镇是传统的华人聚集城市,汇聚了在纽约工作的TMT、生化、医药等行业大量的华人精英群体。朋友介绍,两年来房价稳步上升,他几年前购入的房产,在两年前还下跌10%左右,今年见面时也高兴地说现在已经解套,大概还涨了10%, 一上一下之间,两三年光景上涨20%。


纽约的房子,如果用一个字描述就是"涨",两个字"大涨",三个字"持续涨"。即使在所谓的金融危机期间,也没有下跌。


笔者的一个朋友总结得很好"你看曼哈顿N年不动的地基今年起瞬间变高楼,每个宾馆门面开始重新翻新;波士顿、费城、 华盛顿特区、弗吉尼亚东海岸一路基建工程熙熙攘攘;你再听卖房的资深中介忙得没空接你的电话匆匆挂断,在美中资银行过去18个月房屋贷款业务做到手软,你就知道美国房地产复苏的情况了。" 


简单总结一下美国加拿大考察后笔者的几点体会:第一,华人在美国、加拿大的密度非常之大,可以说无处不在。笔者即使是在偏僻的纽黑文大学(地处西黑文镇)迷路,在一户人家门口的车道调头,也看到几位中国人在门口干活聊天。新泽西的重庆"刘一手火锅店"内的客流和嘈杂程度,基本和中国国内相当。华人已经是美加房地产市场上一支重要的购买生力军。


其二,美国的所谓"大城市"房地产价格比中国现在中心城市还是相对便宜,除纽约之外,50万美元可以在大多数城市买到相当好的房子。对于刚下飞机的华人朋友来说,美国的房价有"致命的诱惑"。


其三,新移民购买力强大,买房子是华人骨子里的特色。统计资料显示,华人新移民多数会在抵埠一年内购买住房。虽然多数华人新移民在美国的银行没有信用分,但由于美国加拿大银行的弹性政策,绝大多数可以变通得到银行按揭。这样对于一般携带较多资金的华人来讲,无形中增大了购买力,买房计划由小房子变成大房子,由一套变成了两套。 


其四,华人爱买房子,但是对房子的经营保养普遍较差。华人把房子当作投资和财富的储存手段,房子很好,但是内部普遍较差,"房子外面一看是老板,进去一看是民工"。相反,西人的房子无论从保养、陈设、绿化、泳池、小细节等方面都要强华人很多。所以,即使华人买房,也多倾向于从西人手中购买。


最后一点观察:华人移民资金外流数量巨大,中国国内地产长期堪忧。笔者接触到的新移民要么正在购买海外房产,要么在办理移民手续的过程中提前购买了房产,还有父母为留学生留在美加购买等等。大老板在整栋楼买,普通人在一套套买,这中间海外中资银行的放水,也大大助力了中国国内的资金外流。


华尔街的一个朋友总结:"中国多年流血流汗积累的财富,正在通过各种途径反哺美国,房地产是主要的投资形式"。中国因素是美国房地产市场火爆的重要推动因素之一,也造成了中国国内房地产市场需求以及资金的流失。这是一个不断"釜底抽薪"的过程,长期看定会对中国国内房地产市场产生质的影响。


你不完全知道的38个历史

你不完全知道的38个历史

2013-09-20  


1、秦始皇灭了六国,但并未统一中国,因为当时还有一个卫国。


2、中国历史上最牛的权臣是南北朝时期的宇文护,他权倾朝野的时代历经西魏、北周两朝,这期间他一共杀了3个皇帝。


3、唐朝最强盛的"开元之治"时期,全国有户820万,是唐朝的最高值;而隋朝"开皇之治"时期,全国就有户890万。终唐一世,各项经济指标都没有恢复到隋朝水平。


4、被"主流"专家们诟病为"军事软弱"的宋朝,对外战争(交战规模万人以上,不包括统一战争和国内战争)的胜率超过了70%;而被认为是军事最强盛的唐朝却在对外战争中胜少负多。


5、宋朝士兵的平均作战负重是32公斤,训练负重还要高于这个数值;现在美国最精锐的特种部队的训练负重不到15公斤。


6、中国在北宋神宗元丰年间(1078-1085),城市化率达到惊人的30%以上;在所谓"康乾盛世"时代,这一比例也不过9%;新中国在21世纪初才重新达到这一数值。


7、同样是元丰年间,中国华北地区的钢铁年产量达到了15万吨;工业革命后的英国在1788年钢铁产量才达到7.6万吨。


8、整个北宋时期,中国一直在扩张领土,直到"靖康之变"的前一年(1126)才停止。北宋前期主要是攻击契丹,到澶州之盟为止;中后期则注重对西夏和吐蕃的攻击,特别是对吐蕃河湟地区的进攻收复了唐代失地,大大扩张了领土。


9、尽管南宋大多数时间都将秦桧作为反面典型,秦桧所创的"宋体字"是整个南宋时期的官方文书通用字体。


10、整个南宋时期,中国一直没有定都,临安府的级别不过是"行在"(陪都)。


11、南宋之所以一直偏安并非完全因为统治者不愿收复故土,而是因为民间反对的声音太大。更让人意想不到的是,民间之所以反对是因为担心收复故土后宋廷会增加江南地区的税收来扶植已被女真人严重破坏的收复区。


12、南宋时期,熟练雇工的工资高于知府工资。(宋朝知府一般是从三品或正四品,年薪在400贯以上,至少相当于今天的15万元人民币)。


13、中国南宋时期最先进的织布机有1800多个活动构件,其中有的技术是现代化织布机也无法达到的。


14、南宋中后期,中国(仅指宋)的人口占世界人口的15%左右,经济总量却占到了全球的75%以上;今天我国人口占世界人口的21%,经济总量占全球比例却仅为4%。


15、在1233年宋蒙联军攻打蔡州的时候,南宋名将孟珙救了蒙古将领张柔一命。4年后,张柔的儿子张弘范出生,而崖山一战灭亡南宋的就是这位张弘范。


16、南宋数学家秦九韶至晚在1247年就已经发现一元三次方程的求根公式,欧洲人在400多年后才发现,但在中国的课本上这个公式仍是以那个欧洲人的名字来命名的。


17、吉尼斯世界记录人类灾难篇排名第二为:元军对宋朝农民的屠杀(3500万人);蒙古帝国军队在13世纪征战在亚欧大陆屠杀了2亿人,成为了人类历史上最不光彩的一项吉尼斯纪录,其中,仅中国境内就有6000万人死于蒙军屠杀;与之相比,遭纳粹屠杀的600万犹太人简直是小巫见大巫。


18、明朝在永乐年间与越南发生了一场战争。此战明朝军队号称80万,而越南军队更是号称700万,实际上双方军队总数加起来也不过30万,这毫无疑问是中国历史上牛皮吹得最大的一场战争,那时越南还是中国属国。


19、郑和下西洋的船队中吨位最大的宝船排水量约为7500吨。


20、中国历史上唯一一个只娶一个老婆的皇帝出现在明朝,他就是明孝宗朱祐樘。


21、中国最早提出计划生育理论的不是马寅初,而是明朝万历年间(1573-1620)的内阁首辅申行时,而最早实施计划生育的时候却是在更早的宋朝。


22、明朝的万历皇帝曾连续28年不上朝,创造了中国皇帝的纪录。但是,这期间中国无论对内还是对外的战争均获得全胜。归根到底是明朝拥有强大的内阁及行政系统,皇权受到极大制约,已经无法与从前的王朝相比。后来满清在这方面发生了极大的历史倒退。


23、自1572年"隆庆开关"到1644年明朝灭亡,这70多年的时间里,全世界生产白银总量的1/3涌入中国,共计约3.53亿两(保守估计,目前重新估计约为5亿两)。并且全球2/3的贸易与中国有关。


24、16世纪西班牙殖民者在南美掠夺的白银几乎都通过贸易的形式最终流入了中国。


25、南宋开禧二年(1206)中央财政收入达到8000万贯钱,当时全国人口约7000万。清廷到1900年代为8000万两,人口却有4亿。而南宋1贯钱购买力是清末一两白银的2倍。更重要的是,宋朝税率低于清廷。


26、公元763年,刚刚经历了安史之乱的唐朝中央政府兵力不足,被叛将仆固怀恩引来30万蛮族军队,将长安、洛阳占领。唐肃宗最后用东都洛阳的全部青年男女和财物作为贿赂,引来回纥军队收复两京,才使汉族免于亡国灭种。


271644年中国北方爆发了一次大型鼠疫,造成驻守北京的20万明军全军覆没,这直接导致了明朝亡于李自成。随后北方牧猎民族乘机进入中原,建立了延续200多年的少数民族政权。与唐朝的游牧民族趁中原王朝内乱入侵相比,明末的这次中原内乱使牧猎民族成功灭亡了华夏政权,建立了导致历史倒退的新政权。


28、被使用时间最长的年号不是康熙,而是明朝最后一个年号——崇祯,一共被朝鲜使用了265年。


29、清廷乾隆时期修《四库全书》,总计存书3457部,79070卷,禁毁6766部,93556卷。


30、发动第一次鸦片战争是英国议会通过投票产生的结果,支持战争的一方仅获得9票的优势。


31、第一次鸦片战争结束后,有人在京城某仓库意外发现一批封存了200多年的火器。这批火器是明朝末年制造的,其中有的竟然比英军的装备还要先进。


32、清廷的道光皇帝为人十分节俭,喜欢穿有补丁的衣服,但打个补丁却要花四两银子。


33、第二次鸦片战争时期,清军曾以12万对阵2万英法联军,结果阵亡3万余,而对方仅阵亡4人,但病死的却有几十人。


34、辽道宗耶律洪基曾写诗表达了后悔自己生在蛮夷之国和"来世做中国(宋)人"的愿望。与之类似的是,宋仁宗庆历六年(1046),朝鲜国王王颛也写诗表达了类似的愿望。


35、南宋灭亡的时候,日本"举国茹素"来哀悼大宋的灭亡。元世祖忽必烈因日本此举,且倭主不来朝贡,造大船7000艘往攻,结果船队被暴风雨所摧毁,日本人从此将此风称为"神风"。二战中"神风敢死队"即出自这个典故。


36、明朝亡后,朝鲜和日本认为中国已亡,日本从此蔑称中国为"支那"。明治维新后,自认为华夏正统的日本曾打着"攘夷主义"的旗号发动甲午战争等对清战争。唐、宋、明时作为对中国文明衷心倾倒的两个附属夷国,日本和朝鲜至今因还因宗主国文化沦丧而对中国存有偏见。


37、由于满清毁书,今天中国大学中文系、历史系的教授经常前往日本、韩国查阅中国古籍,如此才能写出有见地的古代文学、历史论文。


38、列寧不是死於被暗殺,而是死於性病梅毒!



Wednesday, August 28, 2013

“北京有多发达, 河北就有多落后”魔咒打破

"北京有多发达, 河北就有多落后"魔咒打破

2013-08-27  


期待已久的《首都经济圈发展规划》编制工作终于收尾,虽然并无出台的具体时间表,但8月11日,国家发改委地区经济司综合处处长杨荫凯在河北省灵寿县县域新型城镇化路径暨生态经济发展研讨会上向经济观察报透露,规划出台正进入加速度。

十年前,有关京津冀一体化的规划就开始纳入国家发改委的工作。2004年11月,京津冀都市圈区域规划编制正式启动。但因京津冀三地分歧,规划迟迟未能出台。随后,突出北京核心地位的首都经济圈概念出现在2011年版的国家"十二五"规划当中。

新的首都经济圈规划,一个重要功能是为了解决"环京津贫困带"问题。为此,今年的3月和5月,河北省分别与北京和天津市签署了区域合作框架协议,进一步深化合作,着力打造首都经济圈,加快区域一体化进程,共促区域经济社会协调发展。

经济观察报接触的区域经济专家透露,年底或将出台的《首都经济圈发展规划》重新定义了产业升级,平衡了此前京津冀三地关于产业定位的分歧。河北不愿意再做北京的"米袋子"和"菜篮子",他们也要参与圈内的产业竞争。

环京区县脱困路径

"环京津贫困带"是亚洲开发银行在2005年调研之后提出的概念——河北省环绕京津的区域有24个贫困县涉及200多万贫困人口。令人惊讶的是,这片区域与中国西部地区最贫困的"三西地区"相比,处在同一发展水平,有的指标甚至更低。

位于北京天安门正南50公里的河北省固安县,正处于这个贫困带上。虽然紧挨首都,但当时的固安是一个典型的农业县,钓具、肠衣、滤芯和塑料是支撑县域工业的"四大金刚"。2001年,全县财政收入只有9000多万元,连发放公教人员工资都捉襟见肘。

与环绕北京的其它河北省区县一样,谁都不愿意抱着首都的金饭碗受穷,都在想着法子突围。上世纪七八十年代,三河市的燕郊镇,因为有许多国家部委直属单位的迁入而率先突围。如今的燕郊已成功"脱困",并成长为一个近40万人口的北京东卫星城。

但固安并没有这样的先天优势,突围的路径选择也与燕郊不同。2002年6月28日,固安工业园区奠基,并且做出了一个大胆的尝试——采取"政府主导、市场化运作"的开发建设方式。这一市场化模式在当时的中国并不多见。"政府大胆放手,这也是形势逼出来的唯一选择。"廊坊市人大常委会副主任、时任固安县委书记的毕晓明回忆说。形势逼出了成绩:过去十年,固安县财政收入增长20倍,项目总投资增长50倍,年均增速位居廊坊十个县市区之首。

十年来,固安县域经济发展迅速。当地政府提供的数据显示,2012年GDP完成92.7亿元、财政收入19.38亿元,分别比2007年增长121.8%和735.3%。固安作为首都的卫星城,也走出了一条从"无"到"有",从"有"到"优"的产业升级之路。

固安的"脱困"得益于京津冀一体化。固安工业园区建区之初,就看准了北京产业转移的趋势,历时三年投入3000多万元,聘请了8个国家30多位顶级专家完成了工业园区的规划设计。而这一投入相当于当年固安县一年财政总收入的1/3。

正因为有了如此超前的产业规划,通过专业招商、服务创新,使得固安形成了电子信息、高端装备制造和汽车零部件三大产业集群。拥有了一大批行业龙头企业,由农业大县转变为工业强县,实现了产业结构的升级和经济增长方式的根本性转变。

产业升级样本

但承接北京产业转移并非唯一路径。环境污染、产能过剩等问题,也让京津冀三地意识到了产业升级的必要性。今年"两会"期间,李克强总理提出了打造"中国经济升级版"。河北省政策研究室首席研究员马建章表示,产业结构优化升级是转变经济发展方式的关键。

从京津冀都市圈规划到首都经济圈规划,编制工作难度之所以大,原因在于京津冀三地虽有合作意愿,但各自需求仍有不同。三地各有算盘,分歧由来已久。在多次的规划中,河北仅被定位为京津的"米袋子"和"菜篮子"。

河北省显然不只是想做"米袋子"和"菜篮子",他们也需要参与圈内的产业竞争。以产业结构而言,京津冀三地都形成了钢铁、化工、建材、电力、重型机械、汽车等传统支柱产业,而今又在竞相发展电子信息、生物制药、新材料等高新技术产业。

行政体制的束缚也一直是河北省参与京津冀一体化的瓶颈。以交通为例,河北省目前与京津还处于"对而不接、近而不通、通而不畅"的状态,这直接影响相互之间分工合作。而首都经济圈规划将取消圈内的行政关卡、收费关卡等跨区障碍。

因此,重新定位三地的产业结构变得尤为重要。马建章表示,京津冀产业结构总的方向应当是谋求和形成北京高新技术产业和生产性服务业优势、天津先进制造业优势和河北资源及传统产业优势之间的链接机制和互补效应。

马建章希望首都经济圈规划中,河北的产业升级要体现在三个方面:一是促进产业转移;二是以高新技术改造提升传统产业;三是培育战略性新兴产业。如此,河北才能借助京津辐射,进行产业结构调整,发挥基础优势发展新能源、生物医药等新兴产业。

事实上,这已经成为河北省地方政府的共识。2010年河北省提出了建设环首都绿色经济圈的设想,产业升级也是这一设想的路径之一。就连远离首都经济圈核心的石家庄市灵寿县,也希望"在产业发展中,选择高科技产业,减少环境污染"。

比如固安在2013年就邀请麦肯锡重新梳理了产业结构,重筑产业生态系统,目的是希望"固安制造"向"固安智造"和"固安创新"全面升级。

除了三大现有产业集群,固安县还谋划了航天、生物医药、新一代平板显示、节能环保、临空五大战略新兴产业集群,金融、电子商务结算与现代物流两大生产性服务业产业集群。固安冀望到2020年,打造1500亿产值的中国北方"产业高地"。

其中,5月17日开园的固安肽谷,成为河北省产业升级中发展生物医药新兴产业的排头兵。博雅干细胞集团、北京大学分子医学研究所、北京博辉瑞进生物科技有限公司、美国华人生物医药科技协会(CBA)等六个项目的入园拉开了固安产业升级的序幕。

首都经济圈新门户

固安的产业升级想象源自大环境的变化。2012年,北京新机场(也称首都第二机场)确定选址与固安县一河之隔的北京市大兴区榆垡镇境内,大兴区南各庄与河北廊坊市广阳区白家务接壤处。这一选址地处首都经济圈的核心,方便机场辐射京津冀三地。

北京新机场的落户使得这一区域成为首都经济圈的新门户。中国民航大学综合交通研究所所长欧阳杰在接受经济观察报采访时就说,北京新机场经济发展应成为引领京津冀地区区域经济增长的引擎之一;其航空城模式也应成为区域空间结构优化的契机。

早在2009年,廊坊市就已总体规划开发建设100平方公里的临空经济区,共涉及廊坊市广阳、永清和固安三县(区)。如今这一规划已被上升为河北省发展战略。而在北京市大兴区榆垡镇,"首都新航城"的标牌也被立了起来。

欧阳杰认为,从区域宏观层面来看,新机场作为服务于首都经济圈的重大基础设施,应体现出"区域共赢"原则,既能推动区域经济的快速发展,也能实现区域机场体系、区域交通体系和区域空间结构的优化升级,还能带动区域内的产业升级。

这让固安县的产业升级有了更大的底气。依靠空港经济和他们选择了生物医药、新一代信息技术、航空航天制造三大战略性新兴产业,作为未来十年固安产业升级的最强劲引擎。其中,肽谷生命科学园就是其全力打造生物医药科技创新产业的载体。"国内很多发达地区都选择了大力发展生物医药产业,作为推动区域经济升级的突破口。"固安县委书记薛永纯说,上海张江、苏州生物纳米园、北京中关村生命科学园等,都已在发展生物医药产业方面先行一步,成为区域经济竞争的领跑者。《中国产业升级研究报告》的参与者、中国国际经济交流中心秘书长魏建国说,固安肽谷或将成为以战略性新兴产业推动区域产业升级的全新范例。其在产业升级方面的有益探索,意义已远超抢占生物医药制高点、促进区域经济迅速壮大本身。"北京有多发达,河北就有多落后",这显然是首都经济圈需要打破的魔咒。 

京沪服务业PK:北京竞争力不及上海

京沪服务业PK:北京竞争力不及上海

2013-08-28  凤凰网城市

8月27日,社科院财经战略研究院发布了《中国区域服务业发展战略研究》,报告显示服务业竞争综合排名中,上海、北京、天津位列前三。

虽然北京的服务业占GDP的比重要高于上海,但综合竞争力仍不及上海。随着上海自贸区政策的落地,上海的竞争力将进一步加强。

近年,我国经济结构调整,服务业占GDP比重进一步提高。但地区间差异很大,报告建议,未来应加快市场化改革,破除服务业的国有垄断和地区垄断,使得服务业要素在地区间更自由地流动。

北京辐射能力远低于上海

报告显示,服务业综合竞争力排名前三的,分别是上海、北京、天津。京沪两地的水平要远高于其他省份,如排名第四的江苏,其综合得分还不及京沪的一半,天津比江苏略好。

2012年,北京市服务业占GDP比重为76.4%,75%的就业岗位来自于服务业,90%的固定资产投资和实际利用外资投向了服务业。而同期上海服务业占GDP的比例,则首次超过60%。

虽然北京服务业的占比高于上海,但在综合竞争力上却输上海。此次报告的主编之一,中国财经战略研究院研究员夏杰长指出,北京服务业对周边地区的辐射能力远低于上海。上海依托发达的长三角都市圈,通过与周边地区良好的竞合关系,使得综合竞争力优于北京。

夏杰长进一步指出,北京的优势是基本公共服务,而上海的优势则是生产型服务业。北京作为行政中心,通过对行政资源的控制,以及知识密集型产业,如软件信息产业,对周边施加影响。

而上海则是依托其强大的制造业,通过对周边地区的辐射,建立了密切的生产链条。典型的生产型服务业,如金融业的发展,上海要远超北京。随着长三角都市圈的扩围,随着上海自贸区政策的落地,北京与上海的差距进一步加大。

国务院发展研究中心区域经济研究员刘勇指出,上海本身的制造业比较强大,后辐射到周边,带动长三角的发展。而北京的制造业基础不太好,对周围辐射能力不强,河北与北京天津的差距太大,也难以承接相关产业。

地区间分化严重

报告显示,服务业综合竞争力排名里,前九名全部来自东部地区;25名之后的省区,基本来自西部地区。

从服务业占GDP比重这一直观数据来看,高者有已经达到70%多的北京,东部沿海省份如江苏、浙江、天津在45%左右,大部分中西部省份多不超过40%。

中国财经战略研究院院长高培勇指出,今年一季度,我国服务业增加值已经超过工业增加值,成为对一季度GDP的最大贡献者。这折射出,我国服务业发展已经到了一个非常重要的阶段,甚至在今年形成转折点。

国家发改委宏观经济研究院研究员姜长云指出,我国服务业总体而言,发展不足。但个别服务业已经出现过剩,如物流园区的建设,现在就需要进行控制。另外,像一些地方的休闲农业,也出现严重的同质化现象,供给远超需求。

类似情形也发生在金融领域。各地存在大量地方政府保护主义,纷纷采用隐性担保和利率管制手段,进行低水平竞争。

报告建议,未来应加强服务业的区域协调发展。现代服务业应建立在发达制造业的基础上,东北、中西部地区应积极承接东部产业转移。另外,需提高地区间的开发程度,打破垄断,让服务业要素在地区间自由流动。

Tuesday, August 27, 2013

薄熙来为何甘愿“抗拒从严”?

薄熙来为何甘愿"抗拒从严"?

  英国《金融时报》中文网特约撰稿人 章立凡

  薄氏夫妇旨趣不同,一个爱权,一个爱钱。薄熙来竭力强调:他对妻子的敛财不甚知情也不关心,或许有其真实的一面。了解薄熙来的人都知道,他喜欢权力和美女,但对金钱兴趣不大。以中共的特权体制,有钱不是万能的,有权才能拥有一切。

  薄熙来案的实质是政治审判而非司法审判,要害不是贪腐和滥权,而是争夺最高权力。高层出于稳定执政地位大局的考虑,以贪腐控罪替代了政治控罪;而贪腐控罪又避重就轻,以免引发公众对体制性腐败的广泛联想。起诉策略上的投鼠忌器和优柔寡断,使被告获得了背水一战的余地和机会。

  开审前我曾对多家媒体指出,薄在庭上可能有惊人之举。控方或许以为,轻判可以换取薄熙来的认罪,力图将此案对体制的负面影响控制在最低限度。这是太不了解他毫无底线的性格了。庭审首日,薄氏有备而来当庭翻供,迅速打乱控方阵脚。剧情脱离脚本的突变,令无数观众大为亢奋。庭审从预定的两天延长到五天,也反证了控方的措手不及。

  画虎不成反类犬,尴尬的官媒当晚基本失声,新闻联播只字未提薄案,足见事先拟定的通稿已全部作废。次日官媒重整队形万炮齐轰薄氏,给人一种干预司法的强烈印象。由于长期缺乏公信力,公众习惯于同情被官媒攻击的人。薄熙来一贯善于利用媒体造势,尽管他曾肆无忌惮地破坏法制,而官方宣传反倒令他更像一名司法不公的受害者。

  薄案庭审落幕,从法庭展示的证据链来看,由于薄谷开来对腐败财产的实际占有和两人之间的夫妻关系,他几乎没有可能脱罪,反倒可能因翻供导致"抗拒从严"。那么,薄氏冒着重判的风险否认控罪,目的究竟何在呢?

  薄熙来本质上是一个为权力而生、为权力而死的人。若当庭认罪,无论刑期长短,都意味着政治生命的死亡,苟活余生的意义不大。薄也永远是一个搅局的人,当下即便输在法律,他也力争赢回政治。在提起诉讼的前夕,年迈的前最高领导人高调赞扬了现任最高领导人,或暗示党内各派已就薄案达成了某种共识。薄氏力图用翻供阻断"弃子"交易,而在法庭最后陈述中,他平缓地运用体制内语言向高层喊话,仍试图争取支持和同情。

  薄熙来的赌注,是押在未来5-10年间中国可能发生的政治巨变上。他必须否认所有控罪,才能保住东山再起的元气。因此他没有像其他人那样,甘当痛哭流涕认罪的可怜虫,而是力图将自己塑造成 "失败的英雄",以保持"薄粉"队形,提振士气。若上述中期押宝不中,致其在生命有效期内不能出狱,这场审判仍可作为历史舞台上的谢幕演出,将自己树为中国毛左的精神领袖,保持长期历史地位。

  高层决定公开审理并微博直播此案,或许意在彰显反贪腐的决心,修复备受争议的司法公正,并在中共十八届三中全会召开前,促使党内各派达成对未来执政路线的共识。薄熙来出人意料的绝地反击,打乱了上述部署,不仅加剧了社会冲突,还有可能引发新的权力博弈。

  一个睡梦中的体制,不仅丧失了历史感,也丧失了现实感。只要宪政不立,"文革"的温床就继续存在,薄熙来就有咸鱼翻身的机会……

  2013年8月26日 北京风雨读书楼
  2013年8月27日 FT中文网首发

微博文摘 08/27/2013


【段子】金鱼们掉进了粪坑里,大骂说环境太差,蛆爬过来,指着金鱼的鼻子骂:闭嘴!你不能用鱼缸的标准来评价粪坑,根据我们粪坑的标准已经是很好了,完全符合粪坑的发展水平,再说我们秉承先污染后治理的原则,调配这一坑大粪容易吗?然而,当大部分金鱼认命的时候,蛆们却爬出粪坑,变成苍蝇飞走了。

//@财新新世纪周刊:【中国股市的艰难抉择】有人统计,美国人投资证券的财富收入占其财产性收入的40%以上,在1930年-1980年的50年间,美国股市每年以8.3%的回报率成长。而中国股市大多数股票长期不分红或分红率不足1%。

【中国股市的艰难抉择】股市里的资本和权力结合产生的神奇效应是常人难以想象的。随着股市的少数人"点石成金"与大多数人的"血本无归",股市价格扭曲了,资源配置畸形化了,投资保值增值功能消失了,价值发现功能不见了,国民经济的晴雨表不灵了。剩下的除了投机还是投机。 http://t.cn/z8ZKwYq 

【谈"薛"见"官"】薛蛮子嫖的是成年人,官员(校长)们嫖的未成年人;薛蛮子嫖的是妓女,官员们嫖的是处女;薛蛮子嫖资是自费,官员们嫖资是公款;薛嫖妓被人举报抓进拘留所了,官员们强奸幼女的举报人被劳教了;薛是美国人,官员们是中国官;薛嫖娼只关私德,官员嫖处事关公德。

有些人真是太幼稚了!你真以为把人抓了,你就清白了?不是抓了秦火火,就能证明李天一是成年人;不是抓了刘虎,就能证明工商总局副局长没问题;不是抓了周禄宝,非法敛财的寺庙屁股就干净了。杀鸡儆猴,只能对胆小者起到震慑作用,勇敢的揭露者、曝光者、举报者将前赴后继!让我们一起拭目以待!

我们要警惕的是,有人在制造和加深政治恐惧!谁要敢说不同意见,谁就得自己通体透明,像水晶造的。这种制造和加深政治恐惧的行径,不可以接受!不恐惧,才是政治一步步清明起来,结束专制的阳光。向着阳光,拒绝黑暗!  

【媒体称北京地价已疯狂 土地总市值远超美国一年GDP】2011年,《中国经济周刊》发布的《2010年中国地王图》数据显示,如果把北京的土地全部卖掉,可以制造出超过美国一年的GDP总量。而时至今日,这个数字已经把美国2012年的GDP远远地抛在身后。 http://t.cn/z8wEhGD 

【段子】我家祖祖辈辈生活在这片土地上,满洲人来了这块土地是我的,八国联军来了这块土地是我的,袁大头来了这块土地是我的,就连小日本来了也没敢说这块土地是他们天皇的!现在你們来了,你們说这块土地是你借给我的,你們他妈算个什么东西!!!

【北京房租连涨52个月 白领称让人丧失斗志】官方数据显示,截至6月全国房租连涨42个月,北京更是连涨52个月。北京住建委称,据国际标准房租不超收入30%即合理,北京月租仍在可承受范围。但有调查称,房租所占工资比例已由2009年的27.5%升到2012年的39.3%。你的房租占工资几成?(中国新闻网)

【网友支招火车票退票费上涨:先改签再退票】"聪明"的网友想出了应对的"高招":旅客如果要退当天的车票,可以在开车前到车站先办理车票的改签手续,把车票出行日期改成两天后出行,然后凭改签后的新车票再退票,这样退票就无需支付20%的手续费,而只需要支付5%的手续费。(现代快报)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
周立波净说实话,早晚会被消失!
  
周立波:不查都是天灾,一查全是人祸; 不查处处鲜花,一查全是豆腐渣; 不查都是中国人,一查全是外国籍; 不查都是孔繁森,一查全是王宝森;不查个个人模人样,一查全都男盗女娼;不查问题都在后三排,一查根子在主席台;不查都为人民服务,一查全被人民服务;
    
周立波:中国人,了不起,汽油—用不起,桥梁—走不起,学校—上不起,瞧病—看不起,住房—买不起,猪肉—吃不起,房贷—还不起,状子—告不起,官员—惹不起,娃娃—养不起,爱心—伤不起,死了—葬不起。
  
周立波: 1、取消交通管制,让官员感受堵车之苦才能真正治堵;2、取消食品特供,让官员品尝有毒食品才有食品安全;3、取消公务员福利分房,让官员体会买房难,民众才能安居乐业;4、取消公车消费,官员才知油价之高养车之难;5、取消高干特护病房,官员才知看病难、看病贵。

周立波:检查+罚款=管理;扯皮+刁难=服务;实干+技术=白忙;跳舞+喝酒 =业务;听话+奉承=可靠; 大话+做秀=政绩;送礼+关系=提拔;工龄+造假=职称;文凭+拼爹=招聘;和谐 +赞成=民主;联播+歌声=幸福;卖地+盖楼=财政;套话+瞌睡=开会;造假+蒙骗=经营;截访+维稳=安定;贿赂 +人情=法制…
     
周立波:1.贪官不是群众选举出来的,是上级领导选拔出来的;2.贪官不是反贪局捉出来的,是内部互掐抖出来的;3.贪官不是人民监督出来的,是小偷不慎偷出来的;4.贪官不是纪检审查出来的,是小三争风吃醋闹出来的;5.贪官不是百姓举报出来的,是网上日记不慎自爆出来的。
     
周立波:"组织"就是在你遇到困难时,他说无能为力;在你遇到不公时,他说要正确对待;在你合法权益受到侵害时,他说要顾全大局;在你受到诬陷时,他说你要相信组织;在需要有人做出牺牲时,他说组织考验你的时候到了;当需要有人冲锋陷阵时,他说是你坚强后盾;在你取得成功时,他说是组织培养的。

Monday, August 26, 2013

腐败成海外留学申请热门谈资



腐败成海外留学申请热门谈资

2013/08/26 15:08:43

顾蔚

在美国名校每年收到的来自世界各地的几万封申请中脱颍而出并不容易,其中个人给学校的信往往有决定性的作用。过去,中国学生的信往往写得平淡,缺乏特色,但现在有越来越多学生想要与众不同。比如近年来有些学生抨击中国社会的腐败,以表达他们追求在自由社会学习的决心。不过这一招数因为被用得过于广泛,已经没那么有效了。

上周六参加瑞士银行在香港为其私人银行客户举行的一次教育论坛,美国加州大学伯克利分校助理副校长、本科生录取办公室主任Amy Jarich告诉笔者,三四年前,她注意到中国学生开始在申请书中更大胆地表达自己的观点,尤其针对中国腐败的情况。申请人常常表示,这是他们想要去美国学习的最主要原因,因为那里有更公平的环境。
 

Jarich女士说,当学校一开始收到这样的申请书的时候,感到耳目一新,有不少学生成功地进入名校。但最近几年,在申请书里这么写的中国学生多了,他们也觉得不新鲜了,这一招已经不再奏效了。

最近几天,薄熙来案的法庭证词中,他的妻子谷开来揭示了他们的儿子薄瓜瓜奢侈的生活方式。薄瓜瓜曾经在英国牛津大学和美国哈佛大学就读,现在已经被纽约哥伦比亚大学法学院录取。《南方周末》报道说,有一群中国家长去英国私立贵族中学考察,希望把子女培养成薄瓜瓜这样的人才。

根据美国"2012门户开放报告",2011-2012年被美国高等教育机构录取的中国学生数量从15.7万增加到19.4万,增长率为23%,远远超过赴美国际学生平均5.7%的增长幅度。中国学生之间竞争很大,因为美国高校给外国学生留的名额本来就只有两成左右,还有不少学校有些有形或者无形的配额,不希望某个族裔或者国籍的学生比例太高。

但帮助中国学生写入学申请的美国教育咨询专家左贞认为,腐败问题并不容易写。"我很多学生写他们在美国怎么克服文化和生活上的差异,有的故事催人泪下,"她说,"有的话题风险大,学生还是求稳的多。"

如果说十年前,中国学生还有必要向外国教授介绍一下中国大环境的话,现在随着国际社会对中国的了解增加,这么做也没有什么必要了。咨询机构必益教育的创始人William Vanberge说,不建议他的学生谈腐败问题。学生关键是要突出自己对社会问题作了什么贡献,比如针对中国环境污染问题,如果在学校组成一个环保协会,专门收集可口可乐罐头,这也是值得一提的一种做法。

Vanberge说,学校最希望看到学生的领导力。他们如果能够在学校和社团体现出这种能力,以后也更有可能可以创造自己的公司,回馈母校。可以把中国大环境的问题略谈一下做个热身,但关键还是看你对这个问题做了什么,他说。


(本文作者顾蔚是《华尔街日报》中国财富和奢侈品编辑,并负责该报中文网的原创内容。欢迎追踪她的中文网博客"高净值生活",和每周五以中英文双语同步发表的专栏。评论请发送邮件至wei.gu@wsj.com,也可以在新浪微博上(顾蔚WeiGu)追踪她。)


Sunday, August 25, 2013

(轉)「成绩第一名与最后一名」 中国教育的悲哀!!! 很经典!

「成绩第一名与最后一名」 中国教育的悲哀!!!  很经典!          
        
1、小学入学第一天          我对老师说会背301首唐诗做100以内加减法,口齿清晰条理清楚,老师对我眉开眼笑;          张二狗对老师的提问一问摇头三不知,神情呆滞语无伦次,老师对他暗暗皱眉。          
2、小学二年级          我考试次次第一,终于在一次满分后肩膀上多了三条杠杠          张二狗和人打架有赢有输,终于在一次大败后脸上多了三条疤疤。          
3、小学三年级          期末考试我再次拿到语文数学两门功课双一百,老爸被老师请到家长会上介绍家庭教育经验;          期末考试张二狗再次拿到语文数学两门功课总分三十,老爸被老师请进办公室聆听家庭教育经验。          
4、小学四年级          领导前来视察我校,我作为少先队代表上台发言,被大家称为主席台上的模范学生。          校长宣布从严治校,张二狗作为闯祸精代表上台检讨,被大家说是站壁角的形象大使。          
5、小学五年级          我的作文《一个难忘的晚上》在某次大赛中获奖,老师陪我到省城领奖并游玩了一天。          张二狗在一个难忘的晚上爬墙进入某个工厂搬运废铜,门卫陪他到派出所领奖并休养了一天。          
6、升初中了          听说初中的几个班主任为抢我到自己班上而争得面红耳赤。          听说初中的几个班主任为把张二狗踢到别人班上闹得不可开交。          
7、初一时          初一时,我爸在酒店设宴庆功,为我在中学生奥数中获奖请别人一起高兴。          初一时,张二狗爸在酒店设宴赔罪,为张二狗闯的祸请别人不要追究          
8、初二时          初二时,我光荣地加入了学校里的团组织;          初二时,张二狗光荣地加入了学校里的痞子帮。          
9、初三时          班上的班花给我写情书,情书还没到我手里就被班主任发现没收,班主任警告班花:不得妨碍我考重点高中;          张二狗给班上的胖妞如花递纸条,如花转身把纸条扔进垃圾桶,还告诫张二狗:不要妨碍她混初中文凭。          
10、初中毕业了          我理所当然地进入了重点高中          张二狗顺理成章地进入社会深造。          
11、毕业那天          我们初中的门卫李大爷指着我教育大孙子:一定要像我这样好好学习天天向上,将来才能做个受尊敬的人;          我们初中的门卫李大爷指着张二狗教育大孙子:千万不要像他这样惹是生非门门红灯,将来一定是个受鄙视的人。          
12、高中三年          我做过班长团支书学生会主席,获得了一个又一个荣誉、拿到了一笔又一笔的奖学金;          社会三年,张二狗做过混混推销员包工头,积累了一条又一条的人脉,攒下了一笔又一笔资金。          
13、黑色七月          那个黑色七月,我如愿考上省城的大学;          那个火热七月,张二狗如愿在省城注册公司。          
14、大学与商海          大学里我在学海遨游创业中,          张二狗在商海搏击。          
15、毕业那年与创业四年          毕业那年,优秀毕业生我进入人才市场找工作,处处碰壁后不得不把薪金要求降低。          创业四年,民营企业家张二狗进入人才市场找员工,广受追捧后不得不把学历门槛提高到硕士起点,很轻松招揽一群高学历高层次的人才,感受了一夜之间从丑小鸭到白天鹅的荣耀          
16、          我的破永久自行车跑遍全省城,孤身一人凄凄凉凉四处寻找租住的房子;          张二狗的保时捷跑遍全省城,市长区长作陪四处寻找建二狗大厦和工业园区的地块。          
17、          我手头紧张,也想学张二狗白手起家自主创业,从小商品市场批发了一大堆东东搞兼职做起了推销,几星期内亏了一大笔,暗自感慨:做生意原来这么难          张二狗闲来无事,也想进大学校门学习深造增加内涵,请教授吃饭泡校里的美眉就是没认真上课,几年内拿到了MBA学位,暗自感慨:读书原来这么简单          
18、          七夕节,别人介绍的恐龙女 朋友嫌弃我没房没车没出息,和我吹灯拔蜡分道扬镳          七夕节,大学里的校花因为张二狗家大业大前程大,向他眉目传情投怀送抱          
19、          家门口,我哀求俗气的土包子房东缓交房费时唯唯诺诺支支吾吾,净给大学生丢脸          电视上,张二狗对着漂亮的财经频道女主持**谈企业文化          
20、          房价飞涨,我忽然发现在省城有一套房子只能是一个梦想,老爹老妈来省城看过我的租住房,回家后伤心不已          房价飞涨,张二狗把一套又一套的房子赠给各类美女,一小美女的老爹老妈来省城看过二狗赠的复式景观房,回家后得意不已          
21、          春节我回家,没人理睬,路过当年就读的初中,听说里面在办校庆,想去看看却被拒之门外,门卫李大爷指着我教育小孙子:不要学习这个人,读了这么多年书还是一穷二白,连自己都养不活。          春节张二狗回家,县长接驾,还参加当年就读的初中特意举办的校庆,张董在校庆上砸下巨额赞助,门卫李大爷指着张董教育小孙子:你要像主席台上的这个人学习,白手起家富甲一方,连亲戚都沾光。    
22、          十几年前,老师感叹,要是所有学生都像我一样该有多好.          十几年后,老师感叹,要是所有学生都像张二狗一样该有多好          
这就是中国教育的悲哀! 急功近利,浮躁的氣氛甚濃。價值認同單一,掙錢多少、權位高低成為成功與否的唯一評判標準。孩子沒有學會如何獲得生活的快樂。



Wednesday, December 26, 2012

2012-12-26 預定租車租貴了,還不是enterprise的車... 嗚嗚嗚

哎呀,真是好stupid。 
在search 12月28號~1月1號的租車價格時,這次卻沒先在costco travel上seach,不知哪根筋搭錯了,
偏偏想到先用priceline的name your own price。
我最想租enterprise的車,costco travel給出的4天enterprise的價格是:
compact car $83
mid-size car $93
可我用priceline的name your own price訂到的車是:
28號19點~29號19點 1天 National Car Rental  mid-size car $29.72
29號19點~1月1號 19點 3天 Hertz Car Rental mid-size car $74.34
總共 $104
爲什麽會出現4天的租車分成兩次呢?
the reasons 有點複雜,:
1. 之前在National Car Rental的網站上預定了29號~1號 3天的車,價格是$124
2. 今天search之前是想再多加一天(28號~29號)的租車
3. 先在costco travel的網站上單查了28號~29號1天的租車價格,出來的結果是compact car $53, mid-size $55 (enterprise)。
4. 於是就去priceline的name your own price查,結果是28號19點~29號19點 1天 National Car Rental  mid-size car $29.72
5. 於是就斷定costco travel的價格更貴。
6. 完全沒去想查查看costco travel訂連續4天的車價格會是多少呢。結果卻是costco travel訂連續4天的車價格最便宜,而且還是enterprise的車。

enterprise, National Car Rental, Alamo都是我很喜歡的租車行。
Hertz就不是特別喜歡了,因為他們的車里程都很多,沒有enterprise集團下的fleet新。

如果要用costco travel預定,
1. 無需pre-paid,可隨時更改或取消,或根本不去pick up都沒事
2. 租的是enterprise車隊的車
3. 價格只有$93,比priceline的name your own price還便宜10塊!

這真是吃一塹長一智,以後記住永遠先到costco travel search。一天,兩天,幾天的都先用costco travel查。

Sunday, November 4, 2012

The Evolution of Gay Rights in Montreal

The Evolution of Gay Rights in Montreal

Philippe Lavigne-Labelle 

Homosexuality has always existed and fascinated, and it has often been severely punished throughout the Western world's History. It was originally considered a sin in most civilizations and societies, but not all. Some believed homosexuals had magic powers and gave them the status of shaman. In the Ancient Greece, homosexuality was considered normal. In other societies, it was accepted for certain groups like artists and sailors or members of royal courts. Under the influence of the Christian church, though, homosexuality was and remained punishable by death for centuries. 

The last Christian execution happened in Amsterdam in 1730. In the 19th century, the medical definition replaced the religious one. The Austro-Hungarian doctor and sexologist K.M. Benkert created the term "homosexual" in 1869. Later on, in 1897, a certain Dr Hirschfeld from Berlin tried to decriminalize homosexuality. In 1920, thanks to the achievements of his Institute of Sexual Science, the perception of homosexuality as a simple sexual variation gained popularity worldwide. Unfortunately, the Nazi party was elected a few years later. Soon after, the Nazi commanders ordered that all the Institute's books be burned. Then, the party committed the worst act against homosexuals in Western History: they killed between 100,000 and 400,000 of them... In 1948, an event changed the perception of homosexuals forever and paved the way to the emergence of the gay community and liberation. 

The publication of the American biologist Alfred Kinsey' survey on male sexual activity revealed that 37% of men had had an orgasm with another man at least once in their lifetime. Homosexuals now knew that they formed a large number of the population. Nevertheless, they still need to fight for their rights today. This research paper will address the issue of homosexuality and homophobia in Quebec in order to promote diversity and real acceptance, and to support gay people who represent around 10% of the population and deserve equality. It will consist of three main sections: the history of homosexuality, the current situation and some solutions to improve the situation. It will be based on the following thesis: in Quebec, before 1969, homosexuality was a crime, an illness and a sin. Over the last 40 years, homosexuals have won important battles in courts and gained legal equality. Today's objective is to reach social equality by eliminating homophobia and promoting diversity within the different spheres and groups of our society. 

History of homosexuality and evolution of gay rights in Quebec 

Note: Most of the information for the period from 1880 to 1977 comes from Ross Higgins' book De la clandestinité à l'affirmation - Pour une histoire de la communauté gaie de Montréal. 

At the end of the 19th century, a gay life already exists in Montreal. It is completely secret since homosexuality is illegal, but the testimonies, newspaper articles and judicial archives gathered by Ross Higgins prove its existence. In 1880, there are "gathering places" for homosexuals. One of them is the Champ-de-Mars, located directly behind Montreal city hall. Homosexuals go there to walk at night, meet other men and have sexual relations. Another major meeting place is the park on Sainte-Hélène island. In 1891, two boys are arrested in that park for "gross indecency", the most frequently used law against homosexuals, and sentenced to 6 months of imprisonment. According to an article on the Red Light area in Montreal, homosexuals also meet in brothels. The Mount-Royal, which will be the target of several raids in the 20th century, is another key place. Since most of the information for that period is of that nature, little is known on other aspects of homosexuality until the 1930. 

In the 20th century, slowly, new voices are heard in the press and on the radio. People other than the Canadian elite (doctors and priests) can express themselves. After World War II, newspapers start covering homosexuality-related topics. In 1945, they cover the murder of a little boy, Johnny Benson, allegedly committed by an homosexual. The police decide to arrest 150 suspects, all homosexuals. Journalists follow the investigation and describe homosexuals as rapists and monsters. The Journal de Montréalwrites that police authorities gave their officers the order to watch homosexuals who hang around the Mount-Royal... In other articles, homosexuals are also often pictured as transvestites and effeminates. 

The tabloids offer the same kind of coverage, but are much more interested in homosexuality. It's one of their favorite subjects. Gays are often referred to as the "third sex" and "little males" or "little men". The good news is that society talks about homosexuality, even if it is in a very negative way. It remains a taboo, but it's a reality. The first positive articles on homosexuality are published in the 60s. In 1964, Sidney Katz defies traditional opinions on homosexuality in the Maclean's Magazine. A few years later, the Sept Jours magazine pleads for tolerance. 

The real support for gay people comes from literature, cinema and theatre. In the 20th century, the culture presents a positive image of homosexuality and is a plea for tolerance and a refuge for homosexuals. French writers openly defend different sexual behaviors as early as 1840. The French literary world, especially the famous French homosexual author Marcel Proust, influences Montreal. In 1944, the first Quebec novel to address homosexuality (Orage sur mon corps by André Béland) is published. The first play on homosexuality, Les innocentes, sees the day in 1949. Then, a few years later, La cathédrale by Jean Desprez presents a gay character. Les cyniques, a satirical comedian group, denounces society's hypocrisy towards homosexuality. But the most important author is Michel Tremblay. He will contribute to the affirmation of gays in literature and change the Quebec literary world. In Quebec, the first movies to talk about homosexuality are À tout prendre by Claude Jutras and Délivrez-nous du mal by Jean Claude Lord, which tells a love story between two men that turns into a murder. All those cultural products will help homosexuals develop a sense of belonging and identity and will contribute to their liberation. 

Creation of a gay community 

Commercial institutions like bars and restaurants are essential to the creation of a gay community. They slowly increase after World War II and allow homosexuals to gather, discuss and realize that they are not alone. Before 1960, the existence of such places is mostly communicated through word of mouth. Between 1938 and 1948, the Lovell's City Directory reveals the existence of the Eagle Restaurant, the future Monarch, on Ste-Catherine Street. The tabloids often talk about gay places and provide an access to the underground gay world. In 1964, the International Guild Guide, a tourist guide, enumerates eight bars and restaurants for gays, and up to thirteen in 1966. A few years later, in 1970, the local gay publications make their own lists of gay places. The first publication is Le Tiers, the ancestor of the very popular Fugues magazine. Those magazines provide information on various events relevant to the gay community and contribute to the gay life's expansion. 

Gay movement and liberation 

The first gay movements in Quebec and Canada are inspired by a global and dynamic trend. A gay movement sees the day in Germany as early as 1920. In the USA, the first movement is created in California, in 1950. Its purpose is to fight discrimination and police brutality, educate and collaborate with doctors and psychologists. In France, there's the Arcadie movement, similar to the American's. In Canada, one of the first homophile organizations is the Association for Social Knowledge, from Vancouver. In Quebec, Paul Bédard creates the first homophile group, in 1967 or 1968, called, probably, International Sex Equality Anonymous (ISEA). It gives homosexuals a dining room, a bar and a meeting room. 

In 1969, the Weekend Magazine states that the ISEA has more than 4000 members. The same year, Prime minister Pierre Elliot Trudeau passes the Omnibus bill, which decriminalizes sexual relations in private between two consenting adults of the same sex. He also declares that what happens in people's bedrooms is not of the government's business, a statement that will become famous. The adoption of that bill coincides with the Stonewall events in the United States. In Quebec, the counter-cultural magazine Mainmise informs homosexuals of the gay liberation. On March 26, 1971, people in charge of that magazine found theFront the libération homosexuel (FLH), a group inspired by the Quebec nationalist group Front de libération du Québec. The FLH lasts 15 months during which it organizes meetings and events where gays can discuss their condition. A major police operation causes the FLH's dissolution. 

In 1972, an anglophone group - Gay McGill - takes over. Created by McGill University members, it organizes dances for gays as a mean of financial support. It creates a help line and puts the emphasis on services to the gay community. It opens the Drop-in gai, a place for homosexuals. Some of the individuals who meet there decide to form a new group: Gay Montréal. It incorporates under the name of Gay Montreal Association. In 1975, it is dissolved after internal conflicts and the loss of its alcohol license. The same year, the Androgène bookstore is founded. It sells books on the gay liberation and feminism. It represents a good example of cooperation between gay men and women. Another organization, the Groupe homosexuel d'action politique, is created the same year after a major raid at the Aquarius, a gay sauna, where people are arrested for prostitution, a false accusation. 

During the same period, several gay magazines and newspapers are developed (Gay Times, Gay-Zette, Le Gai Kébec...). Still in 1975, Miriam Boghen initiates the Gay Special Project, whose purpose is to provide homosexuals with an English helpline and consciousness raising activities. The French version, Gai écoute, will see the day in 1980. Those two organizations still exist today. In 1976, an important cleaning campaign is launched by the Montreal's mayor Jean Drapeau. It precedes the coming of the Olympics and it multiplies raids against gay institutions. The campaign generates anger among the gay community and the Comité homosexuel anti-répression is formed in response to it. According to Higgins, it marks the beginning of the gay liberation's modern period. Public assemblies are organized. They gather a large number of enthusiastic and angry people, and lead to the first major gay demonstration on June 19, 1976. 

In October, the Comité homosexuel anti-répression creates the Association pour les droits des gai(e)s du Québec (ADGQ), whose purpose is to obtain legal rights, educate and offer a place for homosexuals. A few months later, a huge raid occurs at the Truxx bar. One hundred and fourty men are arrested for being in a "bordello" of for "gross indecency". On October 22, 1977, 2000 homosexuals demonstrate in Montreal. For the first time, newspaper columnists are in favor of homosexuals. A defense committee is created. Five years later, the 120 men involved in the committee will be freed of all accusations. At the end of the year, the ADGQ makes a recommendation to the Quebec Ministry of Justice to include "sexual orientation" in the Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms. Following the events of the Truxx bar raid, the Quebec government decides to act on that recommendation. On December 15, 1977, the Bill 88 is passed and the Quebec province becomes one of the first jurisdictions in the world to offer legal protection for homosexuals and forbid discrimination based on sexual orientation. That is one of the first major victories that will pave the way to other legal victories in the 90s. 

During the 80s, a new plague deeply affects the gay community: AIDS. That devastating disease, seen as the "gay cancer", puts one more burden on the shoulders of gays who consider doing their coming out. The gay community is the target of several political organizations that blame homosexuals for the disease. It fears major setbacks due to the epidemic.
 
For the gay and lesbian community, AIDS was not just the fear of contagion, which it was, nor the loss of friends and loved ones, which it was in abundance, but also the fear that all the recent political gains would be destroyed, it was the fear of a whole culture being destroyed (Ryan 17). 

Surprisingly, those organizations don't have any serious consequences on the community's progress. Thousands of homosexuals die of AIDS though, and the governments are to blame. They keep this epidemic secret as long as it stays in the community. Consequently, gays are not well informed and do not use proper protection. Due to the epidemic, gay and lesbian organizations become HIV service organizations. They work hard to inform the community on that illness. Despite all their efforts, from the beginning of the epidemic to 1997, gay men represent 64% of all the HIV cases diagnosed. This percentage decreases progressively to 40% in 2001. Fortunately, new treatments are slowly developed in the 90s and improved at the beginning of the 20th century. HIV is now more a chronic disease, but still deadly for many. 

Towards legal equality 

The gay community experiences a very difficult period at the end of the 20th century because of the AIDS epidemic. But legally, it accumulates victories. In 1980, the Superior court of Quebec applies the Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms and rules that a school board cannot refuse to rent a room to an organization promoting the rights of homosexuals. In 1982, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms become part of the Constitution of Canada. Three years later, section 15 of the Charter comes into effect. Although it does not specifically include sexual orientation, it is worded to make sure that the guarantee of equality is open ended. 

Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to equal protection and benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability (qtd. in Hurley 1). 

Courts accept that section 15 is to be interpreted broadly. In 1995, in the Egan v. Canada case,  the Supreme Court of Canada confirms the view that sexual orientation  is an "analogous" ground, and consequently a prohibited ground of discrimination under the Charter. In 1996, "sexual orientation" is added to the prohibited grounds of discrimination. The same year, in the province of Quebec, section 137 of the Quebec Charter, which allowed the use of sexual orientation to make distinctions between individual for the purpose of various insurance and benefit plans, is repealed. In 1999, the Act to amend various legislative provisions concerning de facto spouses passes and gives same-sex spouses the same rights and privileges as opposite-sex spouses. 

In 2002, the Act instituting civil unions and establishing new rules of filiation comes into effect and creates a new form of conjugal union, the "civil union". It allows two mothers or fathers to be entered on a child's birth certificate. The last and probably most important victory occurs in 2005 when the Canadian Parliament adopts the Civil marriage Act. It legalizes same-sex marriage. With the enactment of that bill, Canada becomes the fourth country in the World to authorize same-sex marriage. It represents the last step of a long process towards legal equality. That process itself results from a long battle led by homosexuals during the 20th century. A story of ordinary men and women who resisted and decided to proudly express their difference. A question must be asked though: does "legal equality" fully protect homosexuals against homophobia, prejudices and discrimination? In courts, yes. In everyday life, no. 

Current situation of homosexuality and homophobia: Perception of the population - Revealing statistics and analysis 

Note: All the information and data presented in this section come from 6 surveys conducted by the Léger Marketing Research firm based in Montreal between 2003 and 2009. 

It is essential to present and analyze the population's perception in order to describe the current situation of homosexuality and homophobia. Some answers to the questions indicate that the situation is relatively good for homosexuals in this country. However, other answers show that Canadians and Quebecers are still uncomfortable with homosexuality. Generally, the most favorable groups to homosexuality are women, Quebecers, francophones and people with a higher income. The least favorable are men, anglophones, residents of the Prairies (Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba) and people with a lower income. In the 2008 Canadian poll on the perceptions and opinions of Canadians regarding homosexuality, 70% of the respondents say they feel comfortable with homosexuality. 83% of Quebecers share that opinion. For that question, allophones are the least comfortable and francophones the most comfortable. Another good news is that 77% of Canadians (83% of Quebecers) believe that homosexuality is not an illness, and 76% of Canadians (80% of Quebecers), that it's not a mental disorder. Léger Marketing also conducted a survey in 2009 among cultural communities in Quebec. 

The firm interviewed first and second generation immigrants and the results are very different from one generation to the other. There are two reasons for that. Second generation immigrants mainly come from Western Europe or the USA, whereas the first generation comes from Asia, Africa and the Caribbean. Also, a significant proportion of the second generation was born here and grew up in the Canadian culture. For example, 63% of first generation immigrants believe that homosexuality is a sexual orientation like any other; 26% think that it's either an illness or a deviation. But 86% of the second generation believes that homosexuality is a sexual orientation like any other. 

Quebecers from cultural communities are not so favorable to same-sex marriage. Forty percent would like to abolish that right, which is a considerable percentage. When members of cultural communities are asked whether or not homosexuality is normal, 57% say yes and 38% say it's abnormal. Compared to the results from a question in the 2005 survey done by the same firm, those figures are encouraging. In fact, in the 2005 survey on perceptions and opinions of Canadians regarding homosexuality, 49% of Canadians say it's abnormal (38% in Quebec), which is very high. Even though the term "abnormal" is vague, usually, it has negative connotation and it shows how homosexuality causes discomfort. Another question from that survey proves the misconception of Canadians on sexual orientation. Only 40% of Canadians believe that a person cannot choose his/her sexual orientation. One Canadian out of four thinks it's possible to change a sexual orientation, which is false: it is not an option, it's an individual's fundamental nature. 

One of the hardest places to express a "different" sexual orientation is the workplace. In a 2006 survey on homosexuality in the workplace, 61% of respondents (Canadians and Quebecers) claim that it's difficult to openly admit his or her homosexuality at work. Only 39% of Canadians (48% of Quebecers) believe that it's easy to be accepted by management, 38%, by clients and 37%, by close co-workers. Around 60% of Canadians and 55% of Quebecers think that homosexual orientation can be harmful for a career. Finally, 28% of Canadians and Quebecers say they have witnessed hostile behaviors towards a homosexual in the workplace. Those numbers prove how difficult it is to be sexually different in the workplace and show that homophobia is still a reality. 

I would like to finish this section with an important question asked in the 2003 Léger Marketing survey on homophobia in Quebec: (free translation) Have you often, sometimes, rarely or never noticed hostile attitudes of behaviors towards homosexual people? To that question, 32% of the Quebecers said they have witness hostile behaviors or attitudes in their family or friend circle. That number proves that homosexuals are still victims of homophobia despite the considerable progress that has been achieved. As we will see, homosexuals are still fragile in terms of health. They also face serious problems in school. 

Current situation of homosexuality and homophobia: Homosexuality and health and homosexuality in the education system 

Note: Most of the information and data presented in this section come from two reports on homosexuality and homophobia: De l'égalité juridique à l'égalité sociale : vers une stratégie nationale de lutte contre l'homophobie, prepared by the Quebec's Commission des droits de la personne et des droits de la jeunesse, and A New Look at Homophobia and Heterosexism in Canada, published by the Canadian AIDS Society. 

Homosexuality and health 

This section addresses the issue of homosexuality and health and homosexuality in the education system. It also covers the impact of homophobia on homosexuals. Despite their newly-acquired rights, homosexuals are still indirect or direct victims of homophobia. Homophobia and discrimination impact their psychological and physical health and sometimes lead to suicide or drug addiction. Since gay people grow up hearing all kinds of myths and disrespectful comments towards homosexuality, they internalize homophobia. They become homophobic themselves by incorporating the beliefs of their culture that it's wrong to be homosexual.
 
[...] they are learning to feel shame about their own lives, feelings and attractions. This shame will have negative consequences that, for many gays, lesbians and bisexual people, will endure their entire lives as something now called internalized homophobia. It is a major health problem within the gay, lesbian and bisexual community and itself impedes access to mental and physical health services. Combined with the perception that many health and social service professionals may well react negatively to gay, lesbian and bisexual people, this shame keeps people from pursing appropriate health care (Ryan 14).
 
That quote perfectly summarizes the issue of health and homosexuality. The Enquête sociale et de santé du Québec (1998) indicates that gay people experience more psychological distress and depression, and consider themselves less psychologically healthy than heterosexuals. According to that study, the level of drug and alcohol addiction is higher among gays. Homosexuals are also 6 to 16 times more prone to suicidal thoughts. The risk of suicide or suicide attempts is also more significant among homosexuals, who are especially vulnerable during the coming-out period. This is a difficult time for them, because they feel the urge to express themselves, but fear the reactions of their environment (family or friend circles, school, etc.). 

Individuals who question themselves on their sexual orientation and identity don't ask health and social service professionals for help because they are afraid of their reaction and judgment. Consequently, they tend to isolate. Mental problems and suicide affect all categories of age. Thirty six percent of the gay and bisexual men, aged of 18 years or older and living in Montreal, who participated to that study said they did at least one suicide attempt. The suicide risk is higher in homophobic environments and rural areas. 

In rural areas, the acceptance of homosexuality is more difficult. Young people from rural villages of towns are less inclined to divulge their sexual orientation and tend to feel and be more isolated. The lack of resources and social places for young homosexuals, and the absence of public transportation explain that situation. Finally, another huge health problem in the gay community is HIV/AIDS. Like it was mentioned before, gay men represent between 40 to 50% all diagnosed cases, but they only account for 4 to 5% of the population. Discrimination increases individuals' vulnerability to HIV infection. Internalized homophobia and fear of social stigmatization constitute an important risk factor and an obstacle to the adoption of safe sex practices. 

Respect and appreciation from loved ones facilitate the adoption of safe behaviors.  In Quebec, 18% of homosexuals and bisexuals men live with HIV. The death rate has decreased thanks to new treatments. Unfortunately, authorities have noticed that young homosexuals take more risks sexually. Therefore, STDs of all kinds are rapidly increasing. Even though gay people are more inclined to consult their doctor, they often omit to divulge their orientation because they don't feel comfortable enough or are afraid of being judged. Consequently, they don't receive the appropriate information or treatment when it comes to sexual health because they have specific needs. Once again, the fear of stigmatization and judgment affects their health. 

Thus, the consequences of homophobia are significant. They can lead to drug abuse or even death, whether the cause is suicide or HIV. As a society, we must be aware of the damage caused by homophobia, discrimination and silence or inaction. That is especially true in the education system. 

Homosexuality and homophobia in the education system 

Schools are not easy places to be different. Young homosexuals who discover their sexual orientation face intolerance from their peers. Since they spend most of their time in school, that intolerance can have catastrophic consequences. According to a 2002 study conducted by Daniel Martin and Alexandre Beaulieu with 158 school professionals, homophobia is widespread in the education system. Eighty five percent of the respondents said they witnessed homophobia in school. Seventy-six percent claimed they were not well informed on homosexuality and 74% said they needed more information and training on that topic. Those numbers are telling. They prove that homophobia does exist and that the personnel is not properly trained when it comes to homosexuality. 

Most of the homophobic incidents occur (in descending order) in corridors, on the school playground, in the cafeteria, in the school entrance, on the school bus, on the street and in class. Usually, they are most frequent during sport activities, breaks and lunch breaks. Gym classes are the most at risk of seeing homophobic incidents. Finally, boys are more often the target of homophobic acts than girls. 

There's another study that is worth paying attention to. Lyne Chamberland, sociologist and adjunct professor at l'Institut de recherches et d'études féministes, is leading a three-year study on homophobia in high school and CEGEP (college). The data collected so far support Martin and Beaulieu's study but ads new information. The first aspect of the study, conducted with 100 students from three different high schools, reveals that one third of the respondents are victim of homophobic insults or physical violence. It also shows that gays and lesbians are not the only victims. Thus, male students who look effeminate and female students who look too much masculine are also victims of homophobia. Their friends and family are also affected by homophobia. 

Students from homosexual parents are also the target of homophobia. The statistics are very different in CEGEPs. According to the second aspect of the research, conducted with 1844 students from 26 CEGEPS, only 4.5% of the respondents say they are victims of homophobia. Surprisingly, only one third of those respondents consider themselves homosexuals or admit they are questioning themselves, and 65% of them say they are heterosexuals! Those statistics show that homophobia doesn't only affect homosexuals, but any individual who looks different.

The consequences of homophobia are significant. For most homosexuals, adolescence is the coming-out period. Boys and girls are building their sexual identity when in high school. This is why homophobia can have a dramatic impact on their lives. They live isolated, in pain and shame because of the violence they experience. They believe their sexual identity is wrong, which can ruin their self-esteem. Consequently, they often miss school or drop out. Students who question themselves hesitate to ask teachers or other school professionals for help, because they fear the negative reactions. Sometimes, they are right: school professionals are not always opened to homosexuality or properly trained to deal with it. Students find themselves even more isolated when they realize they have nobody to talk to. That is why on the long run, one adult out of two develops suicidal thoughts due to homophobic violence suffered in school. 

Finally, gay teachers often hide their sexual orientation because they're afraid to lose their job or ability to control a class. They prefer to hide their homosexuality and consequently, they miss the opportunity to act as models for homosexual teenagers. Teachers and school professionals are not trained and informed on sexual diversity during their studies in university. Therefore, they are not prepared to react to homophobia and help victims of it. They don't know how to respond to homophobic acts. They hardly detect the stress and distress experienced by the victims. Another problem is the lack of information in the academic material. Sexual diversity is not covered in school manuals, and books on homosexuality are very rare in high school libraries. Therefore, students don't have access to information on their situation and feel even more "alone". 

Most of the people explore or discover their sexual orientation in their adolescence, when they are in the education system. That critical period is made very difficult by intolerance and homophobia. As a society, we need to find solutions to eliminate anything that can disturb the sexual identity process. The government of Quebec is on the right track with its new policy against homophobia, a unique initiative that will help thousands of gay students and adults throughout the province. 

Government actions to fight homophobia 

The Quebec policy against homophobia is a comprehensive initiative that will allow homosexuals and other sexual minorities to reach social equality. Legally, a lot of progress has been made in Quebec since 1977. But to be truly effective, the newly-acquired legal equality must be supported by social equality. This is exactly the purpose of this policy. Here's how Premier Jean Charest presents it:

An inclusive society such as ours must take the necessary steps to combat homophobic attitudes and behaviour patterns, and move towards full acceptance of sexual diversity. By introducing this policy, the government hopes to trigger a firm commitment, by institutions and the general population, to fight all forms of homophobia. The policy sets out the government's goal of removing all the obstacles to full recognition of the social equality of the sexual minorities, at all levels of society. The message is clear: our society has everything to gain from accepting sexual diversity and fighting intolerance (Quebec Government 3). 

The policy acts on the first recommendation made in the report by the Commission des droits de la personne et des droits de la jeunesse, De l'égalité juridique à l'égalité sociale - Vers une stratégie nationale de lutte contre l'homophobie, that I used for the last section of this research. It is comprised of four guidelines and their strategic choices. The first guideline is to "recognize the realities faced by sexual minority members". Since their realities remain misunderstood, it is important to explain them. By informing the population properly, stereotypes and prejudices will be eradicated and homosexuals will be able to freely express their difference. Under Guideline 1, the first strategic choice is to raise awareness and educate, which means to demystify sexual minorities' realities and to promote openness and inclusion. The second strategic choice is to promote research. Its purpose is to improve knowledge on sexual diversity and allow the development of tools to fight homophobia.

Guideline 2 aims at promoting respect for the rights of sexual minorities. Institutions, the general population and victims of homophobia are not fully aware of the rights of sexual minorities, especially those resulting from recent legislative changes. Consequently, the first strategic choice is to promote those rights. The institutions and the population need to be informed on the new rights. Members of sexual minorities must be aware of the laws that guarantee their rights, including the Charter of human rights and freedom, and of the legal recourses and organizations where they can file a complaint. The second choice's objective is to help individuals exercise their rights. 

Too often, members of sexual minorities do not fight for their rights, because they're afraid of the consequences or they don't know how to proceed. The government will encourage the exercise of the rights of sexual minorities by making complaint-processing procedures impartial, effective and prompt in all sectors of activity. 

Guideline 3 aims at promoting wellbeing. Like it was explained previously, members of sexual minorities suffer from discrimination and homophobia and develop all kinds of health problems. The first strategic choice of Guideline 3 is to provide support for the victims of homophobia by giving them access to appropriate services. Society must publicize those services. Special attention must be paid to young people and people living in rural areas. Staff working with young people must be trained properly to be able to better identify cases of distress related to homophobia. The second choice is to encourage adaptation of public services. 

Society must identify and correct institutional standards and practices that result in a denial of sexual differences. It must fight the heterosexism that prevails in all fields of intervention, especially in health and social services. Sexual minorities must feel free and welcome to access those services. Finally, the third choice is to provide support for community action. Government must support LGBT organizations and all those that respond to the needs of people dealing with homophobia. 

Guideline 4 aims at ensuring a concerting approach. It invites all players in society to help meet the objectives. The first strategic choice is to coordinate public institutions' actions. It means to ensure the coordination of the actions launched by the different ministries and public institutions to fight homophobia. The second choice is to ensure the support of local and regional authorities and other government partners. The purpose is to involve as many social players as possible in the fight against homophobia. 

This new policy establishes a framework for the fight against homophobia. The minister of justice, who's responsible for the fight against homophobia, will create an interdepartmental committee that will make sure that this policy leads to the adoption of concrete actions. It will ensure the implementation of the policy and monitor its application. It will be in charge of the coordination with other departmental policies and between government departments and LGBT groups. With that plan, Quebec is definitely moving towards social equality and leading the way. Let's hope other countries will follow the example. 

The history of gays in Quebec is made of small victories and brave ordinary people who decided to resist, put an end to the shame and stop living in secrecy. Less than 200 years ago, homosexuals had no rights. They were criminals, deviants and sinners. During the 20th century, homosexuals began realizing that they formed an important proportion of the population thanks to Kinsey's report.  They started seeing a positive image of homosexuality and hear a plea for tolerance in literature, theatre and cinema. Gradually, they developed a community and places to meet. 

In the 60s and the 70s, political gay movements were created. They led to a better recognition of homosexuals. In 1977, they won their first legal battle in Quebec. That victory paved the way to a long series of victories. Today, homosexuals have the same rights as heterosexuals, but their situation is still fragile. The data collected in the six Léger Marketing surveys show that an important part of the population believes that homosexuality is either abnormal or a sickness. Yes, the numbers are encouraging, but real acceptance is hard to obtain. Homosexuals still feel shame and the need to hide their orientation with some people and in some situations because of the fear of discrimination. 

The coming-out is still an ordeal for adolescents who discover their sexual difference. All those stress factors have devastated consequences on homosexuals' mental and psychological health. They are more at risk of developing suicidal thoughts and contracting STDs due to the inability of health and social services to provide adequate treatments and interventions to members of sexual minorities. This is why, as a society, we must not believe that we have won the war on intolerance and homophobia. We have just won a few battles. We must still openly talk about homosexuality and demystify it. We must say that it's normal and that it's not a choice. 

We must ask every homosexual to proudly express his or her orientation so that everyone realizes that gay people are our neighbors, friends, teachers, members of our family, managers... We must fight the stereotypes. As for the government, it must support LGBT organizations, programs and events that promote and defend sexual diversity. It must implement its new policy integrally and as soon as possible. It must launch campaigns against homophobia and inform the population on homosexuals' rights. We must remember what our "predecessors" have been through and prepare a better future for new generations of homosexuals. 

Annotated Bibliography

Brunet, Anne-Marie. "Homophobe, le milieu scolaire québécois?" L'UQAM - Le journal de l'Université du Québec à Montréal35.14 (2009). Web. November 8, 2010. 

This article gives information and statistics on physical and psychological violence related to homophobia in Québec high schools and CEGEP (general and vocational colleges). It will be useful for writing section IV-B (Homosexuality and the education system). 

De l'égalité juridique à l'égalité sociale : vers une stratégie nationale de lutte contre l'homophobie. Commission des droits de la personne et des droits de la jeunesse, 2007. Web. November 8, 2010. 

This report will be very helpful for covering the following topics of my research: homosexuality and health, including suicide and drug addiction, homosexuality and the education system, homosexuality in the cultural communities, homosexuality and the elderlies, and homosexuality in the country. 

Lee, John Allan. "Homosexuality". The Canadian Encyclopedia. Historica Foundation, 1999. Web. November 8, 2010. 

This source will help me prepare the introduction by providing background information. It will be particularly helpful to write the historical overview in the introduction (section I. A: Homosexuality in Western History and modern society). 

Higgins, Ross. De la clandestinité à l'affirmation - Pour une histoire de la communauté gaie montrélaise. Trans. Alain Beauvais. Montréal: COMEAU & NADEAU, 1999. Print. 

This book provides all the necessary information for section II. A, B and C. In other words, it will allow me to write the history of homosexuality in Québec and Montréal from 1880 to 1977. 

Hurley, Marie C. Sexual Orientation and Legal Rights. Library of Parliament - Parliamentary Information and Research Services, 2007. Web. November 8, 2010. 

This book provides all the necessary information for section II. D (Towards Legal equality - Evolution of gay rights). In other words, it will allow me to describe the homosexuals' important legal victories between 1977 and 2005. 

Léger Marketing Research Firm. Opinion Survey among Cultural Communities in Québec - Perceptions and Opinions of Cultural Communities Regarding Homosexuality. Montréal, 2009. Web. November 8, 2010. 

This survey provides a large number of statistics and information related to the perceptions and opinions of ethnic groups on homosexuality. It will be essential for section III (Perception of the population - Revealing statistics and analysis). 

Léger Marketing Research Firm. Canadian Opinion Poll - Perceptions and Opinions of Canadians Regarding Homosexuality. Montréal, 2008. Web. November 8, 2010. 

This survey provides a large number of statistics and information related to the perceptions and opinions of Canadians onhomosexuality. It will be essential for section III (Perception of the population - Revealing statistics and analysis). 

Léger Marketing Research Firm. Pan Canadian Omnibus Study - Perceptions and Opinions of Canadians Regarding Homosexual People. Montréal, 2007. Web. November 8, 2010. 

This survey provides a large number of statistics and information related to the perceptions and opinions of Canadians onhomosexual people. It will be essential for section III (Perception of the population - Revealing statistics and analysis).

Léger Marketing Research Firm. Pan Canadian Omnibus Study - Homosexuality and the Workplace. Montréal, 2006. Web. November 8, 2010. 

This survey provides a large number of statistics and information related to the perceptions and opinions of Canadians onhomosexuality and the workplace. It will be essential for section III (Perception of the population - Revealing statistics and analysis). 

Léger Marketing Research Firm. Pan Canadian Omnibus Study - Perceptions and Opinions of Canadians Regarding Homosexual People. Montréal, 2005. Web. November 8, 2010. 

This survey provides a large number of statistics and information related to the perceptions and opinions of Canadians onhomosexual people. It will be essential for section III (Perception of the population - Revealing statistics and analysis).

Léger Marketing Research Firm. Étude Omnibus - Perception et opinion des Québécois à l'égard des personnes homosexuelles. Montréal, 2004. Web. November 8, 2010. 

This survey provides a large number of statistics and information related to the perceptions and opinions of Quebecers onhomosexuality. It will be essential for section III (Perception of the population - Revealing statistics and analysis). 

Léger Marketing Research Firm. Étude Omnibus - L'homophobie au Québec : mythe ou réalité? Montréal, 2003. Web. November 8, 2010. 

This survey provides a large number of statistics and information on homophobia and. It will help me prove that homophobia is still very present in today's society. 

Québec Government. Ministry of Justice. Québec Policy Against Homophobia: Moving Toghether Towards Social Equality. Justice Québec, 2009. Web. November 8, 2010.

This source provides solutions to fight/eliminate homophobia. It will be essential for section V (Government actions to fight homophobia). 

Ryan, Bill. New Look at Homophobia and Heterosexism. Canadian AIDS Society, 2003. Web. November 8, 2010. 

This source provides information on the issue of HIV in the gay community. It will be helpful for sections V. A, B, D and F. It addresses the issue of homosexuality in the education health and cultural communities. It also gives information on elder homosexuals.